<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://engineeringtv.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Remote Situational Awareness</title><link>http://engineeringtv.com/blogs/etv/archive/2008/03/19/remote-situational-awareness.aspx</link><description>Army testing has shown that Chatten Associates&amp;#39; Head-Aimed Remote Viewer (HARV) more than doubles the mission performance of remote operations. It can be controlled by either a joystick or the operator&amp;#39;s head motions. Both of these gimbals are</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Debug Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>re: Remote Situational Awareness</title><link>http://engineeringtv.com/blogs/etv/archive/2008/03/19/remote-situational-awareness.aspx#29219</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 23:33:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">47e16688-3829-4dd3-b275-52b24bfef241:29219</guid><dc:creator>Randolph Garrison</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The radio controlled car with cameras a mechanical gripper is a very good first step.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A full &amp;quot;WALDO&amp;quot; (human controlled robot) with completely dexterous anthropomorphic hands, digital control and Hap tics feedback would be much better.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://engineeringtv.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=29219" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>