<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://engineeringtv.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Autonomous Unmanned Surface Vehicle</title><link>http://engineeringtv.com/blogs/etv/archive/2008/08/11/autonomous-unmanned-surface-vehicle.aspx</link><description>The Harbor Wing Autonomous Unmanned Surface Vehicle (AUSV) is unique. Defined by three innovative components: the WingSail, the Hydrofoils, and the Guidance System, it will perform a range of critical missions. The design and integration of these components</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Debug Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>re: Autonomous Unmanned Surface Vehicle</title><link>http://engineeringtv.com/blogs/etv/archive/2008/08/11/autonomous-unmanned-surface-vehicle.aspx#30457</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:14:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">47e16688-3829-4dd3-b275-52b24bfef241:30457</guid><dc:creator>Mike Thomas</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The predator drone aircraft!!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What you have said was the same comment made 20 years ago for the &amp;quot;Predator&amp;quot; look at it today!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You need have an open mind if they can fly a Drone at 60,000 feet from the Middle East to Washington DC&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Then they can make a waterborne AUSV that will be able to do the same.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I support this and anything else that can push the envelope&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://engineeringtv.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=30457" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Autonomous Unmanned Surface Vehicle</title><link>http://engineeringtv.com/blogs/etv/archive/2008/08/11/autonomous-unmanned-surface-vehicle.aspx#30179</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:30:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">47e16688-3829-4dd3-b275-52b24bfef241:30179</guid><dc:creator>Ivan Rotag</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The oceans do not need any more vessels without a human being on watch for a lookout. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;This waterborne AUSV concept will prove to be extremely dangerous unless other traffic is restricted their operating areas. &amp;nbsp;There is no provision for safe or legal operation of this vessel under the International Rules of the Road. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The good news is that I might also be able to legally board this unmanned vessel and claim it as salvage in the open ocean. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;The batteries that will be required to run the damn thing alone should make it worthwhile. &amp;nbsp; That&amp;#39;s assuming that the wind and waves don&amp;#39;t just rip it apart the first time something breaks. &amp;nbsp; The ocean is not very forgiving of mistakes. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://engineeringtv.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=30179" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>